Why 70% of Transformations Fail
(And How to Be in the 30%)
Learn from what actually works—and what doesn't—in organizational transformation
Why Your Best People Sabotage Transformation (And Why They're Right)
Situation: High performers who built their careers on current systems become the strongest resistors to change, often passive-aggressively undermining initiatives they publicly support.
Problem: Organizations label these people as "change resistant" and try to work around them or force compliance, creating a war of attrition that nobody wins.
Solution: Your best people resist because they see what leadership doesn't—the new system threatens what actually works. Include them in designing what to preserve, not just what to change. They'll protect transformation that protects value.
The Efficiency Trap: Why Cutting Costs Costs Everything
Situation: Companies facing pressure immediately cut costs—reducing headcount, eliminating "redundancies," streamlining processes—yet somehow end up weaker and less profitable.
Problem: Efficiency initiatives cut muscle along with fat. They eliminate the informal networks, buffer capacity, and "inefficient" human connections that actually make organizations work.
Solution: Before cutting, map what actually creates value (hint: it's rarely what's on the org chart). Protect relationship networks, preserve institutional knowledge, and cut bureaucracy, not capability. Sometimes strategic inefficiency is your competitive advantage.
The Alignment Myth: Why Perfect Agreement Kills Progress
Situation: Leadership teams spend months getting "aligned"—endless meetings, workshops, documents everyone signs off on—yet nothing actually changes.
Problem: Consensus without conflict creates fake alignment. Everyone agrees because no one says what they really think. The real disagreements emerge during implementation, disguised as "execution issues."
Solution: Replace alignment theater with productive conflict. Surface the real disagreements early. Make decisions with 70% agreement and 100% commitment. Clear decision rights matter more than universal consensus.
Initiative Overload: The Hidden Crisis Destroying Your Organization
Situation: Organizations launch 15-20 initiatives simultaneously—digital transformation, culture change, agile adoption, customer centricity—while wondering why nothing succeeds.
Problem: Multiple initiatives don't add up; they cancel out. Each requires attention, resources, and change capacity. Teams become expert at looking busy while achieving nothing, protecting themselves from initiative whiplash.
Solution: Do less, deliver more. Choose three battles you must win. Kill everything else—publicly and definitively. Give teams permission to ignore non-critical initiatives. Success breeds capacity for more change; failure breeds cynicism.
The Customer Excuse: Why 'Customer-Centric' Transformations Usually Aren't
Situation: Every transformation claims to be "customer-centric." Teams reorganize around customer journeys, create customer experience officers, measure NPS religiously—yet customers notice no difference.
Problem: Organizations use customers as justification for internal agendas. "The customer wants" becomes code for "management decided." Real customer needs get lost in internal translations.
Solution: Stop interpreting; start including. Bring actual customers into transformation planning. Let front-line staff who know customers design solutions. Measure what customers value, not what's easy to track. If customers can't explain what changed, nothing did.
Get New Insights Delivered to Your Inbox
Join forward-thinking leaders getting exclusive insights on transformation that actually works.
While these articles offer frameworks, every situation is unique. If you're ready to apply these ideas to your specific challenges, let's talk.